点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
电影市场迎来强劲复苏******
记者 袁云儿
《阿凡达：水之道》凭借突出的视效走出逆转曲线，《想见你》依靠热门IP带来情怀和浪漫，《绝望主夫》负责营造新年伊始的喜庆氛围感……2023年元旦档（12月31日-1月2日）电影市场迎来关键性的强劲复苏。据灯塔专业版数据，截至1月2日19时，2023年元旦档电影总票房达5.38亿元。
元旦期间，许多观众前往影院观影。影院正在逐步恢复至疫情前状态。
元旦假期三天，全国影院恢复运营水平达到新高，为市场复苏提供了基础。根据灯塔专业版数据，元旦假期三天全国影业影院营业总数都达到10600家以上，且每天的数量都在增多。其中昨天全国营业影院总数为10657家，是去年2月27日以来近10个月的新高，营业率高达85%。随着疫情逐渐平稳，北京、西安、天津、郑州、沈阳、大连等城市《阿凡达：水之道》的元旦档票房反超了影片首周票房。由于影片已经上映一段时间，出现这种逆转，一定程度上说明北方、中部、西部等地区恢复速度较快，观众在逐步回归影院。
元旦档上映的影片中，《阿凡达：水之道》《想见你》《绝望主夫》分列单片票房前三位，这三部影片合计贡献了近95%的元旦档票房，头部效应非常明显。
已经上映超过半月的《阿凡达：水之道》在这个假期实现票房逆转，收获2.73亿元票房，勇夺档期票房冠军。尤其值得一提的是，该片IMAX和CINITY等特效厅票房占到了20%以上。另外，该片的平均票价也从上映首日12月16日的56元下降到50元以下。对于影片市场表现的“回春”，影评人阿甘觉得当在情理之中，因为导演詹姆斯·卡梅隆的作品向来走长线放映，后劲非常足。尽管该片在剧情上遭到太过俗套简单的批评，但在他看来，该片依然是这几年最值得看的电影之一。目前猫眼专业版对该片在内地的总票房预测已从此前的10亿元回升至14.87亿元。
如果说《阿凡达：水之道》是元旦档的大餐，那么爱情片《想见你》和喜剧片《绝望主夫》就是开胃小菜了。前者作为2019年现象级同名剧集的衍生电影，用小清新的风格叠加时空穿越元素，讲述了一个双向奔赴的感人爱情故事；后者则借助喜剧和幻想营造出一个“女尊男卑”的虚拟世界，对大男子主义进行了辛辣的批判与讽刺，呼吁男女平等、女性独立自强。灯塔专业版数据分析师陈晋透露，《想见你》的主要受众为年轻女性，占比接近七成，与《阿凡达：水之道》有明显的差异性。“值得一提的是，影片在跨年场的票房超过1500万元，排名第一，很多年轻观众选择在影院观看这部爱情片，携手跨年迈入2023。”这说明，七夕、元旦等有特殊纪念意义的档期，主打浪漫温馨的爱情片依旧是市场“刚需”。而《绝望主夫》作为元旦档唯一的喜剧片，档期票房也顺利破亿元。
元旦档市场表现可喜，让业内对还有不到三周就将到来的春节档充满期待。截至目前，2023年春节档已有《流浪地球2》《无名》《满江红》《熊出没·伴我“熊芯”》等四部新片待映，其中《流浪地球2》是国产科幻大片的续作，又有吴京、刘德华两位超级明星保驾护航；《满江红》作为张艺谋新作，演员星光同样夺目；程耳执导的谍战片《无名》由梁朝伟、王一博主演，这样的搭配令人耳目一新；而已经多年在春节档“闷声大发财”的“熊出没”系列IP今年又没缺席，且也是档期“硬通货”。未来可能还会有其他影片宣布进军春节档。
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******
中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。
资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。
日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。
日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。
事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。
因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。
日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。
《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。
德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。
日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。
国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。
太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。
Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business
By John Lee
(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.
Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.
The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.
On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.
The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.
In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.
Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.
The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.
The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.
The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.
According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.
As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.
However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.
Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.
The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.
If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.
（文图：赵筱尘 巫邓炎） [责编：天天中] 阅读剩余全文（）  视觉焦点
历峰彩票地图 |
)